Hens Lay Eggs

food for thought

The challenge of poetry

I am not a poet. Let’s get that one fact straight right now. I do not write poetry.

I do, however, occasionally edit poetry.

The poetry I edit generally comes in two versions:

  1. Children’s literature written in verse
  2. Modern poetry.

If someone were to ask me to edit his Shakespearean sonnets, I’d be at a total loss and suggest that poet find a better qualified editor who specializes in poetry and is willing to count syllables, scrutinize rhyming schemes, and ensure alignment with the standards of that form.

There’s more to poetry than the occasional sonnet or haiku, not that many folks I encounter even know what distinguishes a sonnet from other forms of poetry. And, yes, there are many different poetic forms. Off-hand, I can think of three forms of sonnets, although I don’t remember the specifics of each form’s arrangement beyond three stanzas of four lines and a final couplet (14 lines total). The differences have to do with the rhyming scheme.

Writer’s Digest lists 168 poetic forms in this article: https://www.writersdigest.com/write-better-poetry/list-of-50-poetic-forms-for-poets. The list is mind-boggling. Some prescribe a certain number of lines, stanzas, and couplets; others focus on a certain arrangement of syllables and rhymes; still others specify a particular shape of the finished poem.

With many poetic forms, the editor must understand both meter and rhyme. The meter is the beat. English best suits iambic pentameter, which is the meter in which the Bard himself wrote. It’s a two-beat cadence with five feet—da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM, da-DUM. Poets.org posts a good explanation of poetic meter: https://poets.org/glossary/meter. Meter establishes rhythm and helps poets align rhyming schemes.

Not all poetry rhymes. Literature written in verse tends to be directed at very young children who enjoy the sing-song cadence of rhyming words. However, more modern forms place less emphasis on rhyming and more emphasis on meaning and allusion.

Poets, even more so than other authors, allow less leeway in the editing of their work. As an editor, I have mixed feelings about this. With prose, there are certain standards of writing to maintain, from basic subject-verb agreeement to the detection and correction of plot holes. With poetry, the rules for grammar, syntax, sentence construction, and even punctuation are often cast aside—and the poet does not tolerate any change. This basically leaves the editor with the following tasks:

  • Correct misspelled words and typos (e.g., when from is meant and form is written)
  • Faults in meter (i.e., when the rhythm is off)
  • Stylistic consistency (e.g., when every line in every stanza begins with a capital letter).

When I was child, my mother gave me a book of poems, Piping Down the Valleys Wild. I loved that book and read it several times, although I have no idea what happened to it. I enjoyed Edgar Allen Poe’s poems, too. I have Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage by Lord Byron on my Kindle, but have yet to read it. I keep promising myself I’ll do that.

We’re introduced to poetry from the day we’re born. For many, that introduction comes in the form of lyrics to music. Regardless of the musical genre you prefer (except instrumental music), the cadence of music lends itself to poetry. Or maybe it’s the opposite: the cadence of poetry lends itself to music. Even rap, which I deny being music, may be categorized as poetry.

As noted before, many books for the toddler set are written in verse. That’s poetry, too. Consider nursery rhymes. Yep, more poetry.

Oddly enough, I come across a lot of people who write poetry, but not so many who admit to reading it. I don’t know whether that’s because much of the poetry assigned in literature classes is the mind-numbing stuff of John Milton (e.g., Paradise Lost) or whether it’s because poetry tends to be so very personal to the person who wrote it.

If you write poetry, do you read it?

Editing software: Do or don’t?

Remember those old Virginia Slims commercials? You’ve come a long way, baby! That same sentiment may be applied to editing software. It’s come a long way since those laughable spell checkers unable to distinguish between “from” and “form.”

Today’s editing software has much more robust capabilities only strengthened with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI). Programs such as Grammarly, Hemingway, ProWritingAid, PerfectIt!, and AutoCrit give writers a helping hand when it comes to spelling, punctuation, and grammar.

However, they’re not infallible. Neither are humans, for that matter.

Because editing software is programming, meaning it’s basically a complex series of instructions, it understands rules. It does not and cannot comprehend context, style guide idiosyncrasies, and more. Professional freelance proofreader Melanie Cotton explained the failure of of AI with an extensive—but not exhaustive—post on LinkedIn. AI misses many, many problems related to numbers, capitalization, typefaces (bold, italics, underlining), abbreviations, compound items, lists, formatting, layout, tone, terminology, structure, etc.

In addition to AI’s inadequate understanding of the myriad facets of good writing and style, a lot depends upon the writer’s own comprehension. As Cotton succinctly put it: “[Y]ou have to have enough knowledge to know whether Grammarly is right or talking nonsense.” If you don’t understand writing well enough to know whether the “corrections” suggested by AI actually improve what you wrote and are even correct, then you may very well be accepting the introduction of even greater errors into your work.

Although recognizing the inadequacy of editing software, I don’t discourage writers from using it. It helps many writers with basic grammatical and spelling issues that otherwise would slip through their own processes of editing and revision. Its work enables poor or mediocre writers improve upon the craft they’ve adopted as their own. It may even help tighten flabby or weak writing. Editing software is good. It’s just not as good as a human editor. I encourage you to use editing software, just approach it with caution and a healthy dose of critical judgment.

One consequence of relying solely on editing software is its style-numbing effect. If you’ve read AI-generated content, then you know how depressingly and uniformly banal it is. AI rigorously applied to human-written content has the same effect, deadening an author’s distinctive voice and turning an author’s distinctive style into uniform content consistent in its banality.

A human editor works to improve the quality of the content while preserving the author’s voice and style.

Perhaps in the future, AI might be able to truly replace human creativity and mental agility, but until then it’s best to engage the assistance of a skilled professional editor.

Every word counts.

A matter of perception

It’s said that eye witnesses make the worst witnesses in a court of law. This underscores the fact that human perception is notoriously inaccurate. What we think to be the empirical evidence of our senses deceives us. Case in point: the Clifton Gorge Arts & Music Festival.

I have now participated as a vendor at this festival for three consecutive years. The first year, my booth was located on the side of one of the village streets near the center of all the activity. Attendance was impressive: a village of fewer than 200 people drew thousands of attendees to this festival. I was pleased with my volume of sales; however, I didn’t particularly like the spot where my vendor space was situated, so I requested a different location for the following year.

In 2023, my booth was located in the small field across the street from the shelter house where concerts are held. My best friend who accompanies me to most events and sells her paintings along with mine agreed with me: attendance was down from the previous year. My sales numbers confirmed that perception: those were down, too. I thought, perhaps, the lower sales may have also resulted from a compromise between my convenience and prime festival location, with convenience being the deciding factor. However, sales were still sufficiently robust to justify registering for another two gruelling days of work in 2024.

Last weekend saw my third year as a festival vendor in Clifton, Ohio. My booth was located again in that field due to my preference for convenience. (Trust me, lugging merchandise, a canopy, supplies, etc. around the block to a better location was not fun!) The weather, as expected, turned hot and steamy. The hours, as expected, dragged long into Friday and Saturday evenings. Attendence seemed reduced from the previous two years.

The numbers this year are mixed. Acting on the success of 2023, my friend purchased her own vendor space. It was situated next to mine, so we combined our spaces to spread out our wares (books and paintings). Unfortunately, this year, her sales were only about a third of what she sold in 2023. That agrees with the trend of declining sales of artwork we’ve witnessed last year and this year. However, my sales of books and a handful of paintings give lie to the perception that 2024 saw lower attendance and less spending. I sold a similar number of paintings as did my friend, but book sales put my revenue higher than either 2022 or 2023.

In addition, several attendees approached me to discuss publication of their books. We talked about the publishing process; my services in ghostwriting, editing, proofreading, and book design; and the differences between traditional publishing and self-publishing. (HINT: If you’re a control freak like me, you’ll probably opt for self-publishing.)

I certainly hope those folks who indicated they had works in progress will contact me to discuss having their manuscripts edited and their books designed. This is what I do: I help indie authors on the publishing journey.

How may I help you?

Author

Hard boiled, scrambled, over easy, and sunny side up: eggs are the musings of Holly Bargo, the pseudonym for the author.

Follow

Karen (Holly)

Blog Swaps

Looking for a place to swap blogs? Holly Bargo at Hen House Publishing is happy to reciprocate Blog Swaps in 2019.
For more information: 

Get Your Copy of Hen House Publishing Blog via Email:

3 + 6 =